requestId:684c3e47a3f417.45397695.
The Changes of the Yin and Zhou Dynasties: The Source of China’s Unrestrained Confucianism*
Author: Guo Ping (Shandong Confucian Civilization, Province and Ministry of Shandong Province and Ministry of Education, jointly established and jointly innovated by the Ministry of Education, and dcard.)
Source: Source: SourceAuthor Author Authorized Confucianism Published
Original from “Ningxia Social Sciences” Issue 1, 2021
Abstract: Exploring the source of China’s unrestrained concept is an indispensable part of a deep understanding of unrestrained problems. The unrestrained reality is subjective problem, and it is synchronized with the correctness of the subject by the source of China’s unrestrained concepts. The “End Earth and Heaven” conception between the Yin and Zhou dynasties marked the subjectivity first awakened, thus establishing the main position of the clan, and at the same time it also formed the first historical form of China’s unrestrained conception – the clan is unrestrained. The clan’s unrestrained epochal characteristics are the pride of the clan. This laid the foundation for the unrestrained non-individual characteristics of China in modern times, so it is very different from the modern with individuals as the most basic characteristics. But at the same time, the concepts such as “Yi” and “De” that were established in the Yin and Zhou dynasties showed that the clan was not restricted and they also deeply avoided the thinking genes of universality and self-satisfaction, so that they included the ability to transform modern unrestrainedness in logic.
Keywords:Unrestricted from origin, clan subject, clan unrestricted, modern unrestricted
In modern language, people are interested in unintentionally disregarding individuals as a unique form of unrestricted concepts, so that some people have a cruel belief that modern society does not have any unrestricted, or that it is necessary to emphasize that modern society already has unrestricted individuals. However, in the article “Unrestrained by Modern People and Unrestrained by Modern People”, the 19th Century French thinker discovered clearly that unrestrained by individuals is unrestrained by modern society, and modern society has different differences in modern times. Although Joseph’s analysis is not thorough, and even partial (see below), it still reminds us that being unrestrained is not only a modern concept, nor is it just the same as an individual being unrestrained, but has its own differences in historical forms and epochal characteristics. In this regard, exploring the origin of China’s unrestricted concept is naturally an indispensable part of deeply understanding China’s unrestricted problems. Sweetheart Baobabaobaobao Network
1. The reality of unrestricted concepts and their historical form
The method of unrestricted being a human beingIt is a constant transcendence of its own subjectivity, which has the ordinary nature beyond time and space; but any transcendence is not abstract and empty, but always has its own concrete content, so that the unrestricted conception of existence in the concept of existence will eventually and always be based on the unrestricted form of real history. href=”https://twsweetdiary.org/honeydating/%e5%be%9e%e6%af%8f%e5%80%8b%e6%9c%88%e7%b5%a6%e6%88%9120%e8%90%ac%e7%9a%84daddy%e8%ae%8a%e6%88%90%e6%88%91%e7%9a%84%e8%80%81%e5%85%ac/”>Purchase Network is presented.
In the eyes of the writer, the unrestricted historical form is different from the historical transformation of the social subject, and the root cause is that the reality of the unrestricted problem is the subjectivity problem. In this regard, the author once pointed out:
Unrestricted is the opposite state of being bound and being detained and arranged to be disguised. This is undoubtedly a denial of the existence status of a certain passive and affected person. In contrast, being unrestrained is the existence of an automatic, active, capable person, that is, the subject. In this regard, being unrestrained is the internal necessity of the subject, or perhaps being unrestrained is the internal necessity of the subject. In this meaning, unrestrainedness has direct consistency with the existence of the subject. This is because, on the one hand, the subject must be an unrestrained subject. Without being unrestrained, it cannot be called the subject. Unrestrained is the method of existence of the subject; on the other hand, unrestrained has a tendency to be “self”, that is, unrestrained must be an unrestrained subject, and without being unrestrained, there is no way to talk about unrestrained. From this we can say that unrestricted problems are actually subjective problems. [1]
To go forward, in the cutting-edge thinking field of contemporary philosophy, any subjective concept, including unrestricted concepts, is not self-evident, but is derived from the “existence” self of the pre-subjectivity. The so-called “existence” self is the non-existent and endless life self of Huang Yusong’s “Confucianism”. This not only expresses that the social subject is cultivated by one’s own life, but also means subjective sexual concepts, including unrestrained concepts and also originate from one’s own life. Of course, the change in one’s own life determines that the social subject will inevitably change, and unrestrained concepts will also present a historical form of divergence due to the transformation of the social subject. The historical evolution of the two is not only synchronized, but also maintains a mutually integrated relationship, that is, the subject will be unrestrained, and the subject will be unrestrained when there is no restraint.
However, for a long time,People use calm binary analysis of social subject to concealing the transformation of social subject’s era. This view believes that there are two social subjects coexisting in any society: individual and group (or collective), including the analysis of the unrestrained differences between ancient and modern times, and also believes that collective subjects always correspond to public colleagues and personal subjects always correspond to private affairs. [2]45-48 Little do they know that this is actually changing the social subject in the divergent era to the social subject in the divergent field, that is, changing timely problems into communicative problems. This conceals the actual difference between modern and modern ethnic cooperation, that is, the difference between collective and group, and confuses individuals with individuals, which makes it impossible to accurately grasp the historical form of unrestricted concepts and their contemporary characteristics.
In fact, the so-called social subject, that is, the social primary unit, represents the foundation and most basic value of social career. In social career, it is a self-sufficient existence, that is, it is not a wrist or something that realizes other values and goals. Therefore, although individuals generally exist in all societies, they are not necessarily a self-sufficient existence, that is, they are not necessarily the social subject. Although individuals in traditional society also have a proper space for independence, their self-reliance is either unrelated to the ethical career of traditional society, such as the “carefulness” born in Buddhism, or the “natural” of Taoism forgot the world; or the most fundamental difference with the ethical political order of traditional society, such as the “low-cost and sweet rejuvenation” that traditional Confucianism believes, and href=”https://twsugarlover.org/”>Entertain feelingsAny personal words and actions that conflict with the values of the family or clan must not be tolerated. Even the “big man’s fault” explains: “I am about five or six months old in the community, and my husband is not against the relationship between the king and the minister, but thinks that “no father or no king is a bird” (Mencius Teng Wengong 2). Therefore, the “personal” of traditional society is not based on the basic nature of value-sufficient, and is not a real social subject. As a “personal” with value-sufficient, it is a modern subject concept. The nature of individual differences also determines the differences in the quality of ethnic groups in ancient and modern times, that is, the ethnic groups (clans, families) of traditional society are collectives composed of non-valued individuals, while the ethnic groups in modern society are a combination based on the individual subject, that is, groups.Therefore, the translator uses the transformation of the social subject to the historical form of China’s unrestrained view as follows:
This table explains, China Society博官网中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中文中� In contrast, China’s unrestrained concept pre